21 April, 2025

Google system design interview experience

To excel in a system design interview at Google India, you’ll need a structured, methodical approach while demonstrating clarity and confidence. Here’s how you can handle system design questions effectively:

1. Understand the Problem Statement

  • Before diving in, clarify the requirements:

    • Ask questions to understand functional requirements (e.g., "What features does the system need?").

    • Explore non-functional requirements like scalability, performance, reliability, and security.

  • Example: If asked to design a URL shortener, clarify if analytics tracking or expiration for URLs is required.

2. Start with a High-Level Approach

  • Begin by breaking the problem into logical components. Use simple terms initially:

    • For example: "For a URL shortener, we need to generate short URLs, store mappings, and support quick redirections."

  • Draw a rough block diagram:

    • Show user interaction, application servers, caching layers, databases, etc.

    • Use terms like "user sends request," "application generates short URL," and "database stores mapping."

3. Dive Deeper into Core Components

  • Now, drill down into the architecture:

    • Database: What type of database fits the use case? Relational vs. NoSQL?

    • Caching: When and where to add caching for performance optimization.

    • Load Balancing: How to distribute requests across servers.

    • Scalability: Vertical (adding more resources to a server) and horizontal scaling (adding more servers).

4. Capacity Planning

  • Show your ability to handle real-world use cases by estimating resource needs:

    • Storage: How much data will the system store? Estimate based on user base and data size.

    • Traffic: How many requests per second must the system handle during peak load?

    • Throughput: Calculate bandwidth requirements.

5. Address Edge Cases

  • Always include these discussions:

    • How will the system behave under high traffic?

    • What happens if a component fails? (e.g., database failure).

    • How will data integrity and consistency be maintained in distributed systems?

6. Incorporate Non-Functional Requirements

  • Discuss how your design meets:

    • Reliability: Use replication and backups.

    • Fault Tolerance: Explain failure recovery mechanisms.

    • Security: Include encryption for sensitive data and authentication for user actions.

7. Trade-Offs and Justifications

  • Google interviewers love to see pragmatic thinking:

    • Explain why you chose one database over another (e.g., "NoSQL for scalability, as this system doesn't require complex joins").

    • Discuss trade-offs like cost vs. performance or consistency vs. availability (CAP theorem).

8. Be Collaborative and Communicative

  • Keep your thought process transparent:

    • Think out loud and explain your reasoning for every step.

    • If an interviewer questions your approach, handle it constructively and adapt your design if necessary.

  • Use Google’s "smart generalist" mindset—balance depth with breadth.

9. Final Review and Summary

  • Summarize your solution briefly:

    • Reiterate key design choices and how they align with the requirements.

  • Example: "In summary, I designed a scalable URL shortener with a distributed database for storage, Redis for caching popular URLs, and load balancers for handling traffic peaks."

10. Practice Mock Interviews

  • Prepare for common system design scenarios:

    • Design a scalable chat application.

    • Build a global video streaming service.

    • Create a recommendation system for an e-commerce platform.

  • Practice with peers or mentors to refine your communication and problem-solving skills.


I'll approach these system design questions as a Google engineer, incorporating edge cases, design diagrams, capacity planning, and non-functional requirements. Let's dive in:

1. Design a URL Shortener (e.g., bit.ly)

Requirements

  • Functional: Shorten URLs, redirect to original URLs, track usage statistics.

  • Non-functional: Scalability, low latency, fault tolerance, high availability.

Design

  1. Architecture:

    • Use a hashing algorithm (e.g., Base62 encoding) to generate unique short URLs.

    • Store mappings in a distributed NoSQL database (e.g., DynamoDB or Cassandra).

    • Implement caching (e.g., Redis) for frequently accessed URLs.

    • Use load balancers to distribute traffic across servers.

  2. Capacity Planning:

    • Storage:

      • Assume 1 billion URLs with an average of 100 bytes per URL (short + original URLs combined).

      • Total storage: 100 GB for URL mappings.

      • If we store analytics (e.g., click counts), assume an additional 50 GB for statistics.

    • Traffic:

      • Peak load: 10,000 requests per second (short URL redirection).

      • Use Redis cache to handle the most frequently accessed URLs. Cache size: 20 GB.

      • Throughput: Each server can process 1,000 requests/sec. At least 10 servers needed for peak traffic.

  3. Edge Cases:

    • Collision: Handle hash collisions by appending random characters.

    • Expired URLs: Implement TTL (Time-to-Live) for temporary URLs.

    • Invalid URLs: Validate URLs before shortening.

Diagram

Client -> Load Balancer -> Application Server -> Database
       -> Cache (Redis) -> Database

2. Design a Scalable Chat Application

Requirements

  • Functional: Real-time messaging, group chats, message history.

  • Non-functional: Scalability, low latency, fault tolerance.

Design

  1. Architecture:

    • Use WebSocket for real-time communication.

    • Store messages in a distributed database (e.g., Cassandra).

    • Implement sharding based on user IDs.

    • Use message queues (e.g., Kafka) for asynchronous processing.

  2. Capacity Planning:

    • Storage:

      • Assume 10 million users, with each user sending 100 messages/day.

      • Average message size: 200 bytes.

      • Total storage per day: 200 GB.

      • For 1 year of history: 73 TB.

    • Traffic:

      • Peak load: 100,000 concurrent connections.

      • WebSocket servers: Each server handles 5,000 connections. At least 20 servers required during peak hours.

      • Use Kafka for asynchronous processing; throughput: 1 million messages/sec.

  3. Edge Cases:

    • Offline Users: Queue messages for delivery when users reconnect.

    • Message Ordering: Use sequence numbers to ensure correct ordering.

    • Spam: Implement rate limiting and spam detection.

Diagram

Client -> WebSocket Server -> Message Queue -> Database

3. Design a Ride-Sharing Service (e.g., Uber)

Requirements

  • Functional: Match riders with drivers, calculate fares, track rides.

  • Non-functional: Scalability, real-time updates, fault tolerance.

Design

  1. Architecture:

    • Use GPS-based tracking for real-time updates.

    • Implement a matching algorithm to pair riders with nearby drivers.

    • Store ride data in a relational database (e.g., PostgreSQL).

  2. Capacity Planning:

    • Storage:

      • Assume 1 million rides/day, with each ride generating 10 updates (e.g., location, fare, etc.).

      • Average update size: 500 bytes.

      • Total storage per day: 5 GB.

      • For 1 year: 1.8 TB (for historical data storage).

    • Traffic:

      • Peak load: 10,000 ride matching requests/sec.

      • Use 10 application servers, each handling 1,000 requests/sec.

      • GPS tracking: Real-time updates require 50 MB/sec bandwidth.

  3. Edge Cases:

    • Surge Pricing: Implement dynamic pricing based on demand.

    • Driver Cancellations: Reassign rides to other drivers.

    • Network Failures: Use retries and fallback mechanisms.

Diagram

Client -> Load Balancer -> Application Server -> Database
       -> GPS Tracking -> Matching Algorithm

4. Design a Distributed File Storage System (e.g., Google Drive)

Requirements

  • Functional: Upload/download files, share files, version control.

  • Non-functional: Scalability, fault tolerance, high availability.

Design

  1. Architecture:

    • Use distributed storage (e.g., HDFS) for file storage.

    • Implement replication for fault tolerance.

    • Use metadata servers to track file locations.

  2. Capacity Planning:

    • Storage:

      • Assume 1 billion files, with an average size of 1 MB.

      • Total storage: 1 PB.

      • For replication (3 copies): 3 PB.

    • Traffic:

      • Peak load: 10,000 uploads/downloads/sec.

      • Each server handles 1,000 requests/sec. At least 10 servers required.

      • Metadata size for tracking files: 100 TB.

  3. Edge Cases:

    • Large Files: Split files into chunks for efficient uploads/downloads.

    • Conflicts: Implement version control for concurrent edits.

    • Data Loss: Use replication and backups.

Diagram

Client -> Metadata Server -> Distributed Storage

5. Design a Search Engine

Requirements

  • Functional: Index web pages, return relevant results, handle queries.

  • Non-functional: Scalability, low latency, fault tolerance.

Design

  1. Architecture:

    • Use web crawlers to index pages.

    • Store indexed data in a distributed database.

    • Implement ranking algorithms (e.g., PageRank).

  2. Capacity Planning:

    • Storage:

      • Assume 1 billion web pages, with an average size of 10 KB per page.

      • Total storage: 10 TB.

      • For additional metadata (e.g., indexing terms), storage increases to 20 TB.

    • Traffic:

      • Peak load: 100,000 search queries/sec.

      • Each server handles 1,000 queries/sec. At least 100 servers required.

      • Cache size for popular queries: 5 TB.

  3. Edge Cases:

    • Spam Pages: Filter out low-quality pages using heuristics.

    • Query Failures: Provide fallback results.

    • High Traffic: Use caching for popular queries.

Diagram

Client -> Load Balancer -> Search Server -> Database
       -> Web Crawler -> Indexing

These answers incorporate edge cases, design diagrams, capacity planning, and non-functional requirements. Let me know if you'd like to explore any of these designs further or add more details! 😊

No comments:

Post a Comment

Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture

 Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture Here’s a clear side-by-side comparison between Microservices and Monolithic architectures — fro...