SQL vs NoSQL Interview Questions

February 26, 2026 • By Surya Singh • SQL • NoSQL • Database • Interview

SQL vs NoSQL interview questions — when to use relational vs document vs key-value databases.

SQLNoSQLDatabaseInterview

Key Takeaways

  • 1SQL: relational, schema, ACID, joins; NoSQL: flexible schema, horizontal scale, eventual consistency common.
  • 2Choose SQL for: complex queries, transactions, strong consistency. Choose NoSQL for: high throughput, flexible schema, horizontal scaling.
  • 3NoSQL types: document (MongoDB), key-value (Redis), wide-column (Cassandra), graph (Neo4j).
  • 4Modern trend: polyglot persistence—use the right DB for each use case.

The questions below are commonly asked in technical interviews. Each answer is written to help you understand the concept clearly and explain it confidently. Focus on understanding the "why" behind each answer—that is what interviewers care about.

In this guide

Interview Questions & Answers

When should I choose SQL over NoSQL?

Choose SQL (PostgreSQL, MySQL) when you need complex queries (joins, aggregations, subqueries), strong consistency and ACID transactions (e.g., banking, orders), or a well-defined schema that will not change frequently. SQL databases excel at relational data and reporting. They also have mature tooling, backup, and recovery. Use SQL when data integrity and consistency are more important than raw write throughput or schema flexibility.

// SQL - joins, aggregates, transactions
// C# with Dapper or EF Core
var sql = @"
  SELECT o.Id, o.Total, u.Name
  FROM Orders o
  JOIN Users u ON o.UserId = u.Id
  WHERE o.CreatedAt > @Since
";
// ACID transaction
using var tx = await conn.BeginTransactionAsync();
await conn.ExecuteAsync("INSERT INTO Orders...", param, tx);
await conn.ExecuteAsync("UPDATE Inventory...", param2, tx);
await tx.CommitAsync();

When should I choose NoSQL over SQL?

Choose NoSQL when you need horizontal scaling (sharding across many nodes), very high write throughput, flexible or evolving schema, or when your access pattern is simple (key-value lookups, document by ID). Document stores (MongoDB) fit nested, heterogeneous data. Key-value stores (Redis) fit caching and session storage. Wide-column stores (Cassandra) fit time-series or write-heavy workloads. NoSQL often trades consistency for availability and partition tolerance (CAP).

What are the main types of NoSQL databases?

Document: store JSON/BSON documents (MongoDB, CouchDB). Good for nested data, flexible schema. Key-value: store values by key (Redis, DynamoDB). Good for caching, sessions, simple lookups. Wide-column: store data in columns, not rows (Cassandra, HBase). Good for time-series, write-heavy, huge datasets. Graph: store nodes and edges (Neo4j). Good for relationships (social networks, recommendations). Each type optimizes for different access patterns.

Can I use both SQL and NoSQL in the same application?

Yes. This is called polyglot persistence. Use the right tool for each use case: PostgreSQL for transactional data (orders, users) and complex queries; Redis for caching and session; Elasticsearch for full-text search; a message queue for async processing. The trade-off is operational complexity—more systems to maintain, monitor, and keep consistent. Use it when the benefits (performance, flexibility) justify the cost. Start simple; add databases when you hit real limits.

What are the trade-offs of NoSQL's flexible schema?

Flexible schema lets you add fields without migrations and store different shapes in the same collection. But you lose database-level enforcement of structure—invalid or incomplete data can creep in. You must enforce schema in application code or use tools like JSON Schema. Joins are harder (often done in the app) and reporting can be slower. For rapidly evolving prototypes, flexible schema helps; for mature systems with clear structure, a relational schema can be easier to maintain.

Loading...

XLinkedInFacebook
Surya Singh

Surya Singh

Azure Solutions Architect & AI Engineer

Microsoft-certified Azure Solutions Architect with 8+ years in enterprise software, cloud architecture, and AI/ML deployment. I build production AI systems and write about what actually works—based on shipping code, not theory.

  • Microsoft Certified: Azure Solutions Architect Expert
  • Built 20+ production AI/ML pipelines on Azure
  • 8+ years in .NET, C#, and cloud-native architecture
LinkedInTwitter/XAbout Me